The Evergreen LOPA Database is a benefit for employees of CCPS Member Companies. In order to access the full database, login here. companies use the values for an IPL or IE listed in the LOPA guideline book ( CCPS,. ), or elsewhere, but without implementing the management systems to. LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis) is potentially a useful tool in performing risk . Institute of Chemical Engineers Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS).

Author: JoJojar Gugal
Country: Nepal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 7 July 2016
Pages: 82
PDF File Size: 14.28 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.75 Mb
ISBN: 598-4-69885-750-2
Downloads: 38898
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arakinos

Layer of protection analysis LOPA is the newest methodology for hazard evaluation and risk assessment. Pick the method appropriate for the scenario and goal of the analysis. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.


Case Studies and Workshop: Learn rules for how and when to use LOPA Learn how to develop scenarios for either a new process or changes to a process Learn how to develop scenarios starting from a qualitative hazard evaluation e.

Scenario evaluations Day 2: Ccpss that said, many folks companies, as noted by Ricardo invent their own definitions for LOPA outside of CCPSin which case we recommend they invent a new name for their method or perhaps say they are using a combo of FTA and LOPA which is normally the combo case they choose to use.

HAZOP analysis Learn to estimate the frequency category for the initiating event of a scenario Learn how to determine the consequence category for the unmitigated scenario Learn how to determine which protection layers meet the criteria for independence and uniqueness Learn how to calculate the scenario risk Learn how companies around the world are using LOPA to determine which scenarios pose the greatest risk and which scenarios have residual risk that is too high Receive a detailed student notebook with example problems and solutions Receive a copy of the CCPS book on LOPA Receive example risk acceptance and judgment protocols Ccls a certificate of completion 1.


Leave A Comment Cancel reply Comment. Combine this course with Safety Integrity Level and save! By Ccpps Bridges T Further, many times the causes have common causes such as human error and LOPA limits against inadvertently overlooking common cause human error are very strict.

ABS Group Training | Layer of Protection Analysis

Other methods, especially Fault Tree, are more appropriate to treat multiple initiating events. LOPA helps the analyst make consistent decisions on the adequacy of existing or proposed layers of protection against an accident scenario. Remember, if you want to sum initiating events of scenarios, there are other methods available without the simplifying assumptions of LOPA.

But, in a chemical process, many times there are more complex and much more diverse causes of similar but not the same scenarios and the safeguards are not applicable to each cause. If you want to use multiple initiating events, then use FTA and then ETA to model the scenario; but before you do that learn the ins and Outs of those methods to see how to account popa same, how to account for common-cause errors, limitation of the simplifying assumptions, etc.

Services Safety, Risk and Compliance We can teach this course at your office. ,opa times simply summing the initiating events is not appropriate due to limitations in the simplifying assumptions behind the development of LOPA. Team Discount cannot be combined with any other discounts or promotions.

Toggle Sliding Bar Area. Currently you have JavaScript disabled.


Layer of Protection Analysis

If you want to see a discussion of this issue and others related to LOPA, one paper is: And yes it says you can sum scenarios, but it does not say you can sum initiating event frequencies. You are welcome to e-mail at wbridges piii.

Bill is considered one of the leading authorities on process safety engineering, risk management, and human error prevention. Be Performed During Major Projects?

Cvps my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. PSM process safety management — Basics: On a sliding scale of sophistication and rigor, LOPA lies between the qualitative end of the scale characterized by methods such as hazard and operability [HAZOP] analysis and what-if analysis and the quantitative end characterized by methods using fault trees and event trees.

Pulling it all together Risk Tolerance Criteria Examples Development and implementation Dealing with liability concerns Special Applications; facility siting and safety interlocks with workshops. There are simple examples which seem to make a case of summing initiating events.

In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. He has over 30 years of experience, ccpa more than 20 in senior management and senior PSM advisory roles.

MULTIPLE CAUSES USED IN LOPA – Process Improvement Institute

The technique is ideally suited for companies striving to meet specific risk targets or to lower risk as low as reasonably practicable ALARP. There are others papers on ccpss website www. How does LOPA work?